I think, that it's not an extreme guro. The girl is dressed, so it's not a hentai. This picture is not very bloodied. In this site I saw the many guro images, that are more bloodied. I think, that this image should not delite.
jumhuria said: I think, that it's not an extreme guro. The girl is dressed, so it's not a hentai. This picture is not very bloodied. In this site I saw the many guro images, that are more bloodied. I think, that this image should not delite.
Can someone show me a link to the forum post or rules section which details what kind of guro is considered too offensive? I'm having a hard time finding anything of that nature, so all I have to go on with people flagging these posts is their preference. I want to see where the full rules section is as well, to re-familiarise myself with it.
That other one, I'm not sure how it got through, either.
Generally, blood without a clear source, robots with exposed wires, or "clean" amputations are fine, but open bloody wounds or "action shots" of characters mid-dismemberment get deleted.
(Especially if it's a character some people like, and don't want to see hurt. You can show "guro" of Kyubee all you like.)
NWSiaCB said: That other one, I'm not sure how it got through, either.
Generally, blood without a clear source, robots with exposed wires, or "clean" amputations are fine, but open bloody wounds or "action shots" of characters mid-dismemberment get deleted.
(Especially if it's a character some people like, and don't want to see hurt. You can show "guro" of Kyubee all you like.)
I still want to see some proof we can do this, I may like guro, but I at least want to double check myself with hard proof that such rules exist. For future pictures of course.
