Larger version of post #143447

New users take note: this is a good example of something deserving of the "what" tag. If you look at the picture, and don't get the same feeling you get from this one, don't use "what".

no_seriously_what fits much better here.

No, seriously. Stop tagging wrong.

What in the world is a no_seriously_what tag?

Something that does not, and should not ever, exist. End of thread.

kumarei said:
Something that does not, and should not ever, exist. End of thread.

Denying your own existence?

There were no objections against this tag before danbooru crashed; it was actually welcomed by the posters.

Crashed? It was taken down because it was getting flooded with shitty images and tags.

Lepperchaun said:
Denying your own existence?

There were no objections against this tag before danbooru crashed; it was actually welcomed by the posters.

Welcomed? It was redundant and even more subjective than "what". What's next? An "excuse me wtf is this" tag?

I don't think you understand this whole thing. Subjective tags are actively discouraged. "What" is used only for things that fall so far outside the realm of sensibility that you don't know what the hell you would tag them.

Lepperchaun: I'm not sure what you mean that "there were no objections" before danbooru went down. There has always been debate about whether to use subjective tags, and other than "what" and "vip_quality", the answer was that they are not helpful. This is why there is no cute tag.

Stop trying to make new subjective tags. This has been argued out; they are not welcome.

Alright, you win. We'll never agree about the matter of different tags for different 'levels of weirdness'. Too subjective indeed.

"lolwut"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPsd5BhDNu4

This should explain it.