Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? shu (loveeater) 77

Copyright

  • ? touhou 949k

Character

  • ? sekibanki 6.1k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? :d 617k
  • ? alternate costume 502k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? bow 1.3M
  • ? clenched hands 47k
  • ? collarbone 887k
  • ? foreshortening 58k
  • ? full body 957k
  • ? groin 159k
  • ? hair bow 595k
  • ? knees together feet apart 34k
  • ? leaning forward 130k
  • ? legs 163k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? midriff 332k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? parody 88k
  • ? red hair 594k
  • ? shoes 645k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? short shorts 158k
  • ? shorts 510k
  • ? simple background 2.1M
  • ? smile 3.3M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? standing 1.0M
  • ? standing on one leg 95k
  • ? style parody 22k
  • ? zun (style) 1.6k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? ↳ bad pixiv id 990k
  • ? photo (medium) 19k
  • ? traditional media 96k

Information

  • ID: 1692675
  • Uploader: Fhtagn »
  • Date: about 11 years ago
  • Approver: Saladofstones »
  • Size: 124 KB .jpg (664x1154) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/43645801 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 3
  • Favorites: 10
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (about 11 years ago)
sekibanki (touhou) drawn by shu_(loveeater)
  • ‹ prev Search: user:Fhtagn status:deleted status:deleted status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    p s maniac
    about 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    I may be wrong, but its the only picture in which we can see her neck

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 341186
    about 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    i really don't see the "harm" in jpeg artifacts when that's the source and the image is otherwise good. it's no "worse" than oekaki art, technically speaking.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    about 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    Despatche said:

    i really don't see the "harm" in jpeg artifacts when that's the source and the image is otherwise good. it's no "worse" than oekaki art, technically speaking.

    Being the source doesn't mean that it's high quality. Highest, yes, but if it's still too low to be worth it, then...

    It's kinda weird to take photos of your work instead of scanning it in this day and age. They seem pretty prevalent.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /