Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? seiya (iiseven) 90

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 512k

Characters

  • ? hamakaze (kancolle) 10k
  • ? isokaze (kancolle) 2.8k

General

  • ? 2girls 1.1M
  • ? alternate costume 502k
  • ? bare shoulders 1.1M
  • ? bikini 560k
  • ? black bikini 129k
  • ? black hair 1.7M
  • ? blue eyes 2.0M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? hair ornament 1.6M
  • ? hair over one eye 282k
  • ? hairclip 375k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? multiple girls 1.7M
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? partially submerged 38k
  • ? red eyes 1.4M
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? swimsuit 734k
  • ? wading 41k
  • ? white bikini 107k
  • ? white hair 809k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? highres 6.1M

Information

  • ID: 2420153
  • Uploader: andalus »
  • Date: about 9 years ago
  • Approver: user 460797 »
  • Size: 630 KB .jpg (1200x1800) »
  • Source: seiga.nicovideo.jp/seiga/im5941984 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 13
  • Favorites: 13
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 70% of original (view original)
hamakaze and isokaze (kantai collection) drawn by seiya_(iiseven)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 夏の浜、海の磯

    いい夏、素晴らしい海!!

    • ‹ prev Search: user:andalus next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    user 460797
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    What a flag reason is this here? Could the flagger get more precise here...plox :3?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    T34-38
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    This post was flagged for deletion:
    terrible

    Whoever made this flag has some poor insight.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 368087
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Well, the artstyle is quite blurry and smeared, Isokaze's face is also quite uneasy to watch. Artist was trying to do that "painted" feel, but it's quite not that.

    Tho, it's not "terrible" art, the flag is... pointless. It's not the best picture, but it's decent and acceptable quality.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Drewko said:

    Well, the artstyle is quite blurry and smeared, Isokaze's face is also quite uneasy to watch. Artist was trying to do that "painted" feel, but it's quite not that.

    Tho, it's not "terrible" art, the flag is... pointless. It's not the best picture, but it's decent and acceptable quality.

    If the flagger doesn't say anything here, I think I'll approve this post.
    "Terrible" is not a good reason to "circumvent" an approvel of a Janitor.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    BrokenEagle98
    about 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Well, the art style is acceptable, and IMHO acceptable-level quality posts don't deserve a flag, only poor/bad quality posts.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /