Why -1?

That's a very wide chair.

FJH said:

That's a very wide chair.

There are chairs like that in the US. It's for extra large people.

It's a chair for two, if you know what i mean ;3

Drewko said:

Why -1?

I haven't voted on this picture, but I can only assume it's because

• it looks like the artist couldn't figure out how to make the pose work with a normal-width chair
• the shading isn't great
• the shape of her arm (singular, where's the other one?) looks off, and putting it at an almost 90° angle made it more noticeable
• the shadows on the floor make it look like the chair is floating (why was the metallic glow applied to the non-metallic wheels?)

fossilnix said:

I haven't voted on this picture, but I can only assume it's because

• it looks like the artist couldn't figure out how to make the pose work with a normal-width chair
• the shading isn't great
• the shape of her arm (singular, where's the other one?) looks off, and putting it at an almost 90° angle made it more noticeable
• the shadows on the floor make it look like the chair is floating (why was the metallic glow applied to the non-metallic wheels?)

It's approved so whatever, and the flaws that you pointed out are rather... small, imho almost non-existant and minusing pictures fo "lulz chair is too wide!" is quite... bad.

Can i please to reaprove this one and just STOP BEING RETARDED!