Do boobs that waterballoon-ish count for bad_anatomy? Is jall_boint supposed to be the artist?
Circle_breasts could be a tag, possibly one that implicates bad anatomy if you seriously wanted to fire shots. By itself, the bad anatomy tag tends to focus on grievous mistakes and obvious flaws. If you put it on an image for the reason you're saying it would seem out of place, especially with circle boobs being common in anime styles; too many people don't think twice about this sort of thing that you'd confuse a lot of people trying.
Circle_breasts could be a tag, possibly one that implicates bad anatomy if you seriously wanted to fire shots. By itself, the bad anatomy tag tends to focus on grievous mistakes and obvious flaws. If you put it on an image for the reason you're saying it would seem out of place, especially with circle boobs being common in anime styles; too many people don't think twice about this sort of thing that you'd confuse a lot of people trying.
Some people still consider/evaluates anime girls as real girls.
Some of us like things to resemble that which they're emulating. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Resemble and Emulating aren't words to use if you have specific and exquisite tastes. Because you know, you are not the one who defines which images resembles better the reality if you want to compare fiction and reality just for reducing and restrict the concept of art to your "Ideal, Non excesive and erotic proportions"
I'm not really sure what your point is. Real boobs don't look like that (at least without surgery which would probably get called "a bad boobjob") and that's all I'm really saying. You can like boobs to look like that in hand-drawn pictures if you want, I'm not trying to stop you (if I were the image would be flagged), but we're also both equally entitled to opinions. I asked if they fit under a tag; they don't. Whether it's even really a taggable attribute, I'm not sure.
