Pssst, look! Another submission that's an unrealistic representation of life. Guess we better remove it for being fictional and stylized. Let's get the laundry lists of problems with this image:
-Tiny nose and mouth, bulbously-large irises, and lack of pupils?
-Animal parts on a human body? Darwin is turning in his grave right now!
-Impossible clothing and disproportionate breasts?
-The poorly-drawn webbed man's hand? Who knows, maybe he's part frog. Ugh...
-Floating jewelry with nothing to suspend from to portray their connection to the unrealistic cow ears?
-Worst of all, colors aren't this flat or lacking in details in real life. Where are the pores? The hairs? The sweat? The wrinkles? Terrible, just terrible!

I demand this be removed at once! It fails to meet my standards of realism!

RhythmicApogee said:

Pssst, look! Another submission that's an unrealistic representation of life. Guess we better remove it for being fictional and stylized. Let's get the laundry lists of problems with this image:
-Tiny nose and mouth, bulbously-large irises, and lack of pupils?
-Animal parts on a human body? Darwin is turning in his grave right now!
-Impossible clothing and disproportionate breasts?
-The poorly-drawn webbed man's hand? Who knows, maybe he's part frog. Ugh...
-Floating jewelry with nothing to suspend from to portray their connection to the unrealistic cow ears?
-Worst of all, colors aren't this flat or lacking in details in real life. Where are the pores? The hairs? The sweat? The wrinkles? Terrible, just terrible!

I demand this be removed at once! It fails to meet my standards of realism!

You ok there, bud?

Randeel said:

You ok there, bud?

Letting out some steam by mocking the thought process behind what is and what isn't "acceptable" for the site, proportions being the topic I was sarcastically criticizing while other legitimately bad works get away with being approved (not that this one is bad in particular. That's subjective).

RhythmicApogee said:

Letting out some steam by mocking the thought process behind what is and what isn't "acceptable" for the site, proportions being the topic I was sarcastically criticizing while other legitimately bad works get away with being approved (not that this one is bad in particular. That's subjective).

I guess it was you who flagged this, but be aware that if a character is having animal parts, that this is not a valid flag reason. I also don't know if you did this just for fun, but if so then you probably should let it go. That doesn't make the whole flag invalid, but one should only put these parts into a flag that have some weight.

Provence said:

I guess it was you who flagged this, but be aware that if a character is having animal parts, that this is not a valid flag reason. I also don't know if you did this just for fun, but if so then you probably should let it go. That doesn't make the whole flag invalid, but one should only put these parts into a flag that have some weight.

I knew the flag was never going anywhere, so I trusted that no one would follow suite and flag the post for the same (non-serious) reasons. I had no real intentions of getting the image removed other than to poke some ribs here and there.

RhythmicApogee said:

I knew the flag was never going anywhere, so I trusted that no one would follow suite and flag the post for the same (non-serious) reasons. I had no real intentions of getting the image removed other than to poke some ribs here and there.

So you're openly admitting to flag vandalism for the purpose of mocking other users?

TheGame7 said:

So you're openly admitting to flag vandalism for the purpose of mocking other users?

I've contacted this user and pointed them to topic #13177 and howto:flag. I see no need to discuss this further, though.
Bad anatomy tag is already added (weird collarbone oO).