Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? orihi chihiro 269

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 513k

Characters

  • ? shoukaku (kancolle) 6.8k
  • ? zuikaku (kancolle) 10k

General

  • ? 2girls 1.2M
  • ? areola slip 58k
  • ? arms behind back 98k
  • ? bikini 566k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? collarbone 894k
  • ? condom 37k
  • ? condom in mouth 6.4k
  • ? condom wrapper 15k
  • ? grey hair 800k
  • ? hair tie 26k
  • ? hairband 545k
  • ? hand on another's shoulder 31k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? micro bikini 48k
  • ? mouth hold 87k
  • ? multiple girls 1.7M
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? red bikini 37k
  • ? skindentation 132k
  • ? small breasts 561k
  • ? smile 3.3M
  • ? swimsuit 743k
  • ? white bikini 108k
  • ? white hair 816k
  • ? yellow eyes 802k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? ↳ bad twitter id 214k
  • ? jpeg artifacts 26k

Information

  • ID: 2728874
  • Uploader: used 491970 »
  • Date: about 8 years ago
  • Approver: .grey »
  • Size: 69.6 KB .jpg (646x954) »
  • Source: twitter.com/orihi_/status/865517096016293895 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 43
  • Favorites: 59
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
zuikaku and shoukaku (kantai collection) drawn by orihi_chihiro
  • ‹ prev Search: user:used_491970 next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    .grey
    about 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Indeed the artifacting is pretty awful... but not awful enough to warrant deletion. It would need to be much worse.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 509825
    about 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Mikaeri said:

    Indeed the artifacting is pretty awful... but not awful enough to warrant deletion. It would need to be much worse.

    This flag reason is also only valid on third party edits and not for Twitter recompression.
    But even then one should find a better version first.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    .grey
    about 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Provence said:

    This flag reason is also only valid on third party edits and not for Twitter recompression.
    But even then one should find a better version first.

    You're right, but to make this extremely clear: Twitter artifacts the original image a lot, that's a given. But for an image to be deleted because of artifacts, it needs to be either very bad -- on fault of the original artist (if they've really really messed up how to properly export their image), or from a third-party website or reposting site which would induce further resampling. A reupload of a Twitter sample on Twitter, for example.

    Or a sample of a reupload of a Twitter sample from another Twitter sample that was reuploaded from the original tweet, for further obfuscation :^) (and this is why we emphasis links to tweets, not images!)

    In any case, lot of artists make it a habit to collect their posts on Twitter first and then batch them all to upload. Most of the time it isn't worth waiting so long anyway, but that depends on the artist of course ;)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /