Guys, the image is fine. It even went to the Perfect Feet pool, and the main point of the image is the foot. No need to flag it, it's a good image, the body is fine (from my point of view is fine, I don't have a foot fetish but it's fine).
Nobody said it's not fine. The problem is that the first comment is pretty much needless provocation.
Guys, the image is fine. It even went to the Perfect Feet pool, and the main point of the image is the foot. No need to flag it, it's a good image, the body is fine (from my point of view is fine, I don't have a foot fetish but it's fine).
Just as Provence said, no one (in this comment section) said there's anything wrong with this image. I just responded to the first user's passive aggressive remark by saying I can flag the image for him if he wants me to.
Also, when flagging posts you look at the overall quality not just specific points, this one is good enough.
EDIT: And no, downvoting my comments won't change the truth.
Just as Provence said, no one (in this comment section) said there's anything wrong with this image. I just responded to the first user's passive aggressive remark by saying I can flag the image for him if he wants me to.
Also, when flagging posts you look at the overall quality not just specific points, this one is good enough.
You're all misunderstanding. Someone keeps flagging Matsunaga-sensei's pics as anatomically incorrect. There are 2 pics now under review and they have already gotten one removed. Obviously, they have a problem with this artist, as there are a shitload of pics that could be flagged for far worse than these. If it told us who did the flagging, I would address them directly...
You're all misunderstanding. Someone keeps flagging Matsunaga-sensei's pics as anatomically incorrect. There are 2 pics now under review and they have already gotten one removed. Obviously, they have a problem with this artist, as there are a shitload of pics that could be flagged for far worse than these. If it told us who did the flagging, I would address them directly...
1. Those that were flagged had some problems with anatomy, if they were fine someone would approve them.
2. Flagging 3 posts out of 1062 can hardly be called "having a problem with this artist".
3. Using the argument "there are worse pics out there" in any way will lead to people not taking you seriously. It has been heard a milion times and it wasn't good back then and it's certainly not good now.
EDIT: And downvoting my comment ain't gonna change the truth.
You're all misunderstanding. Someone keeps flagging Matsunaga-sensei's pics as anatomically incorrect. There are 2 pics now under review and they have already gotten one removed. Obviously, they have a problem with this artist, as there are a shitload of pics that could be flagged for far worse than these. If it told us who did the flagging, I would address them directly...
