Maybe, but do we need light/dark versions of all hair colour tags? This was discussed without any conclusion back in topic #13860 and I agree that IF they stay (which I don't think they should) they should at least imply their basic colour.
I hope the topic reaches a conclusion. But shouldn't the tag stay here if it gets implicated? (Especially since it's closer to silver here than blue but that's of course very subjective.) Light blue hair has a fairly high post count and to only remove it from some images sounds odd.
I hope the topic reaches a conclusion. But shouldn't the tag stay here if it gets implicated? (Especially since it's closer to silver here than blue but that's of course very subjective.) Light blue hair has a fairly high post count and to only remove it from some images sounds odd.
But then you shouldn't have removed the blue hair tag in the first place using the same logic, if you only added light_blue without removing blue I wouldn't have done anything. Also I'd nuke the tag myself but given how large it is it would take too long to do it manually and it's sure to upset someone. Also given the fact that the topic is 7 months without a post I doubt anything is gonna happen with it.
