[deleted]

Guaro1238 said:

Reapproved, even though it's not the style I like, but I doubt the flagging reason is valid.
As I guess that the flagger is the same as the uploader of the child: Don't flag images because you're butthurt of the deletion. Inferior images aren't approved if there is a higher quality image uploaded and just because that happened after the inferior upload, doesn't mean it's okay to flag the superior image.
And this image was uploaded by an unrestricted user, so it wasn't approved in the first place.

I uploaded the child, but I didn't flag it.

[deleted]

Guaro said:

Reapproved, even though it's not the style I like, but I doubt the flagging reason is valid.
As I guess that the flagger is the same as the uploader of the child: Don't flag images because you're butthurt of the deletion. Inferior images aren't approved if there is a higher quality image uploaded and just because that happened after the inferior upload, doesn't mean it's okay to flag the superior image.
And this image was uploaded by an unrestricted user, so it wasn't approved in the first place.

Reapproved, even though it's not the style I like....

Whew lads.

Edit: Got a negative strike for bumping this comment.
Ostensibly for bumping it I should say, had anyone asked I would have said the bump was intentional as this is pretty relevant but nobody did.
Edit Edit: After a short appeal note the mod decided to make it a neutral, which I am thankful for. The takeaway is pretty much always more communication is better.