When absurdres isn't quite enough to cover how big a pic gets.
42MB for one single pic...we really need an even higher level of absurdres because at 10000x10000 I kind of doubt what we usually put in absurdres qualifies anymore.
Something like "God'sWallpaper" or "Incrediblyabsurdres"
This isn't all that big is it? I think I uploaded some 11000x25000 size pictures before.
Basically you could print these onto a pillow/sheets and have it life-size. 300dpi print would be about 33inches whit 10000pixels if I calculated correctly. Though you would need to find a place that could actually print them out in the first place in these sizes.
This thing taxed my computer to it's limits. The default Window XP image-viewer couldn't handle it. Faststone crashed. Only Photoshop allowed me to reduce it size... It still took a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time to do it.
hmm... I can usually always open these images within a minute or so opening them in Gimp whit my 4Gigabyte memory and Phenom X4 9750 in win XP SP3.
Well as there is a new "incredibly_absurdres" tag I should go and add that tag to quite a few of the uploads I have then? What size definition should mark the difference between "absurdres" and "incredibly_absurdres"? Anything over 5000pixels? or should it be at 10000px? Well I'll start putting it in use whit pictures in 10000px for starters.
In resizing it to true definition, I was bemused to see that detail in the nipple, and curious that the mole looks circular despite the position leading me to think it oughta be slightly ovular (if it isn't). The grainy swimsuit material texture(s) is(/are) nice, too. There's other things, like the fingernail outlines integrated with the fingers' color fill-in, but the pic's having some trouble being looked at (it reloaded?!), so the finer details of much of it are lost to me by one means or another.
KamiNight said: What size definition should mark the difference between "absurdres" and "incredibly_absurdres"? Anything over 5000pixels? or should it be at 10000px? Well I'll start putting it in use whit pictures in 10000px for starters.
I'd go with the 10000px ones too (since that is a rather big size, my computer loads it fine on danbooru but it takes a while), anything lower should stick with the usual absurdres up until the point it reaches only highres.
I edited the incredibly_absurdres wiki page to include the line: "Usually applicable when one or both of the image's dimensions is in the 5-digit range."
Somehow, the picture won't load on my computer anymore. Either way my computer said "fuck it" and won't do it again, or the mods made it that we mercifully have to click the "Original Image" button first. ... And what the fuck? We can only post ONE COMMENT EACH HOURS???? O_o
Kanrabat said: Somehow, the picture won't load on my computer anymore. Either way my computer said "fuck it" and won't do it again, or the mods made it that we mercifully have to click the "Original Image" button first. ... And what the fuck? We can only post ONE COMMENT EACH HOURS???? O_o
if you don't have enough ram, your computer might abort the load process.
also, click "post without bumping" to continue posting.
