Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? mon (manarestra) 60

Copyright

  • ? azur lane 139k

Characters

  • ? pola (azur lane) 580
  • ? ↳ pola (seaside coincidence) (azur lane) 305

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? 2boys 355k
  • ? :>= 5.9k
  • ? after fellatio 6.2k
  • ? afterimage 13k
  • ? ahegao 22k
  • ? bar censor 176k
  • ? bikini 562k
  • ? bikini pull 9.6k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? censored 515k
  • ? clothes pull 89k
  • ? cum 275k
  • ? cum in mouth 32k
  • ? cum string 9.7k
  • ? dutch angle 132k
  • ? fellatio 75k
  • ? female pubic hair 97k
  • ? greyscale 551k
  • ? hand up 411k
  • ? heart 675k
  • ? heart-shaped pupils 97k
  • ? hetero 610k
  • ? huge breasts 247k
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? monochrome 693k
  • ? multiple boys 538k
  • ? multiple penises 20k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? nipples 921k
  • ? official alternate costume 404k
  • ? oral 91k
  • ? penis 464k
  • ? plump 36k
  • ? pubic hair 151k
  • ? pubic hair peek 6.9k
  • ? shiny skin 135k
  • ? sidelocks 714k
  • ? solo focus 399k
  • ? stray pubic hair 4.3k
  • ? swimsuit 738k
  • ? symbol-shaped pupils 188k
  • ? testicles 103k
  • ? tongue 435k
  • ? tongue out 323k
  • ? topless female 77k
  • ? twintails 1.0M
  • ? v 176k

Meta

  • ? commentary 1.7M
  • ? ↳ symbol-only commentary 135k
  • ? highres 6.1M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.1M

Information

  • ID: 4567681
  • Uploader: dean exia »
  • Date: about 4 years ago
  • Size: 3.36 MB .jpg (2894x4093) »
  • Source: twitter.com/MaNaResTra/status/1401175377846751243 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 91
  • Favorites: 133
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 29% of original (view original)
pola (azur lane) drawn by mon_(manarestra)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 🍖

    • ‹ prev Search: cum_string next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Jimmani20
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    -7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    anhdunghisinh
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Jimmani20 said:

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    Why people downvote this comment? The author of this post has responsiblity to tag the post correctly as much as possible, this is how wiki page works.

    -11 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Jerseyboy95
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Some of them freaky Pasta girls will try and suck your soul out if you're not careful. I had something of an experience.

    Updated by Jerseyboy95 about 4 years ago

    -2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NNescio
    about 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    Jimmani20 said:

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    anhdunghisinh said:

    Why people downvote this comment? The author of this post has responsiblity to tag the post correctly as much as possible, this is how wiki page works.

    Because the original uploader already tagged the whole thing pretty much to Level 3 with 43 tags. It was already more than enough a good job.

    Complaining someone missed, what, multiple penises? Not every people remember that kind of tag unless they upload images with, well, multiple cocks on a frequent basis.

    Complaining someone missed 2boys (and by extension multiple_boys)? In hindsight this should have been tagged with those (because of the nature of the work), but for most non-porn posts most people don't bother to count unidentifiable out of frame people. The 'mistake' was perfectly understandable.

    And that's why people downvoted that comment. Original uploader made a good, detailed effort to exhaustively tag most taggable elements in this image, 'missed' just ONE tag (or two if you don't count the implication) that a lot of people would exclude anyway on other posts (if not because of the specific nature of this work), then gets whinged at because of missing that ONE tag. Not to mention said uploader is also a senior user with a long history of contributing to this site.

    Updated by NNescio about 4 years ago

    5 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /