Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? gohika 3

Copyright

  • ? street fighter 28k

Character

  • ? chun-li 7.7k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? armpits 270k
  • ? arms behind head 57k
  • ? arms up 211k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? brown eyes 921k
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? bun cover 20k
  • ? china dress 64k
  • ? chinese clothes 128k
  • ? collarbone 890k
  • ? crop top 224k
  • ? double bun 143k
  • ? dress 1.5M
  • ? hair bun 286k
  • ? large breasts 1.8M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? spikes 49k

Meta

  • ? ai-assisted 4.4k
  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? ↳ bad twitter id 213k
  • ? ↳ inactive account 21k
  • ? commentary request 3.6M

Information

  • ID: 6119331
  • Uploader: Wilfriback »
  • Date: over 2 years ago
  • Approver: VR-Man »
  • Size: 228 KB .jpg (550x756) »
  • Source: twitter.com/nft011302260408/status/1632174873090097152 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 58
  • Favorites: 62
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (over 2 years ago)
chun-li (street fighter) drawn by gohika

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • #格ゲーキャラ描こうぜ #春麗
    #ストリートファイター #イラスト

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Wilfriback status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    VR-Man
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Artist posted this, probably to prove that he drew it himself. I approved it for now. Feel free to flag if it turned out he was lying (again).

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Chilly93
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    VR-Man said:

    Artist posted this, probably to prove that he drew it himself. I approved it for now. Feel free to flag if it turned out he was lying (again).

    I can't flag it, but there is evidence against him here https://twitter.com/positiveHIKASEN/status/1632491619734913024/photo/1

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Chilly93 said:

    I can't flag it, but there is evidence against him here https://twitter.com/positiveHIKASEN/status/1632491619734913024/photo/1

    We're more interested in this particular post. I'm suspicious of that one split bang, personally.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Mayhem-Chan
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    We're more interested in this particular post. I'm suspicious of that one split bang, personally.

    ...and the one bang on the right side merging into the eyelashes
    and the oddities in the yellow crescent things around the breast's area
    and the one odd color change in the armpit on our left, right on top of the breast

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cd young
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    this feels like a witch hunt rather than a serious discussion.

    -12 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    feline lump
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Given that this person already has a bad track record of lying about AI usage and art theft, and this image still has facial details randomly merging into each other, I think the most likely explanation is that he started painting over his AI bases to dispel criticism. The end result is way more blotchy than the fully AI-generated pieces he tried to pass off as his. Technically, that would make it AI-assisted, but that doesn't preclude it from being flagged for its laziness.

    6 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CitrusC
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    feline_lump said:

    Given that this person already has a bad track record of lying about AI usage and art theft, and this image still has facial details randomly merging into each other, I think the most likely explanation is that he started painting over his AI bases to dispel criticism. The end result is way more blotchy than the fully AI-generated pieces he tried to pass off as his. Technically, that would make it AI-assisted, but that doesn't preclude it from being flagged for its laziness.

    Is that going to be the loop hole to have this thing around? AI art that's somehow even worse via manual smudging?

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Marlin
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    CitrusC said:

    Is that going to be the loop hole to have this thing around? AI art that's somehow even worse via manual smudging?

    Yeah, I'm with you on this one. And this is muddy topic: what's worse, posting those manmade horrors as is, or tracing it to make something yourself? Can you even say you made it yourself, or is that just a plain deception? How's that different from regular tracing? What does artistic integrity and "originality" even mean?
    Nah, ban this too, leave no loopholes.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    feline lump
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Technically, we never banned tracing either, but it is unlikely to get approved if it's lazy and dishonest. Same thing with a lot of AI-assisted. Sending this one back into the queue whenever the 3 day timer expires.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /