Interesting that one of the Pixiv tags is "pokesupe?".

prolly short version of pokemon special

That's what it means.

I mean that even the artist is unsure if this involves, in part or in whole, SPECIAL. That Red is definitely the games', but Blue only exists for those as a stand-in and concept art. crossover? I'll leave that to another.

Green was originally going to be a playable character in the 1st Gen Pokemon games. I was thinking this was partially behind the artist's motivation for the picture since Blue seems to be more from the games.
Frankly, I'd just like to leave the tags as they are since she really only exists in Adventures anyway.

red, blue

you got a little something.....dripping from your noses

i find it funny how blue and red are trying to act as if their not cold

And Charmander's gettin' self-sufficiently cozy.

Is Blue actually a character in the games? If this is from Pokemon Special how come Red is different?

Poor little ones , they've got colds .. even bulbasaur has . Btw , Green is the most intelligent , he's even wearing a scarf ! And is it just me or his legs look girly ?

Anyway this Red is from the games , while Blue is only in pokemon special .

Poor little ones , they've got a cold .. even bulbasaur has . Btw , Green is the most intelligent , he's even wearing a scarf ! .. is it just me or his legs look girly ?

This Red isn't from the games since it's a non-canon design, but it is supposed to be used for game!Red. That's gen-one!Leaf with Blue's haircut; she should have a hime cut.

I take it this is game fanart honestly.